User talk:Prowland

--hmmm hmmh mhmmm hmm-- Don't mind me, just cleaning up my user page (largely so I can try out my signature and make sure it's working like I hope). &lt;-&gt; Philip Rowland &lt;-&gt; 14:23, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Faction Page Question.
Just wondering, but could we add description sections for each Faction? Currently I am wanting to add the S3 Strat Guide descriptions of the S4 Factions to each of their pages. Would this be alright? And could we also start doing this with Monsters, too?--AXl 19:58, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I like the idea for the factions for sure. We just need to figure out a way to cite the addition since I'm assuming it will be a verbatim paste from a published source. Also, can you give us a preview of what it would be for the Monsters? ---Galactus--- 20:02, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Basically just take the Descriptions posted of the Monsters in either the Blogs or the Strategy Guides. Should be simple enough, IMO. --AXl 20:21, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, what is a Verbatim Paste? Unfamiliar with the term.--AXl 20:24, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, but according to what you would do, where would you have it? At the top of the page after all the general info is what I'm thinking.  Verbatim merely means "word for word". ---Galactus--- 20:25, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I was thinking first thing in the article after the "click HERE to go HERE" box. So, in other words, yeah. And thanks for clearing that up, btw. +) --AXl 20:29, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Personally I think it should go just before that box, as the descriptions usually apply to the monster as a whole, and if it went below said bow it might look or feel like it was just referring to the alpha form. What say you? ---Galactus--- 20:37, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree. Before is just fine.  Looking at other wikis, it seems like that's how it should be for what AXl's saying. -&gt;Prowland 20:40, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, whatever the case may be, I have an example of what I mean for the Factions on the Savage Swarm page. Not sure how to cite it tho, so if you guys could help with that and/or move it to where you think it should go, be my guest. +) And yes, that IP address is mine. I opened a new window for it and I wasn't logged in on the new window. +(--AXl 20:44, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * So no second paragraph for the backgrounds or what? Just want to make sure. --AXl 20:50, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * We should be able to cite it by doing something like a reference of the source . How does everyone feel about using something like this? -&gt;Prowland 20:15, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Works for me just fine. ---Galactus--- 20:16, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

=References=

Map Template
I know that you guys have been saying you were going to do this for a while now. How's the current progress on the template? I want to make map articles. +)--AXl 13:17, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The trick is figuring out a good format that gets the information across that we want without wandering all over the place. Go ahead and start trying to put things together. If we like it, we may adopt it as a template. The important thing is to get all the vital information across (particularly foundation count, spawn zone count, and other objective spaces) but it might also be nice to include in the summary something like the number of rough/impassable/cover terrain naturally on the map. Go to town, I look forward to seeing what you come up with. &lt;Philip Rowland&gt; 01:54, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Ooh, sounds fun. Expect great things. +) --AXl 22:11, 19 April 2010 (UTC)